Category: ACA

Trump Administration Again Takes Aim at Pre-Existing Conditions

  

Even as individual states take steps to expand health coverage, the Trump administration continues its misguided approach to restricting access to care. The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) on Thursday June 7th filed a brief in U.S. District Court in the case of Texas v. United States which indicates that the government will no longer defend the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act’s (ACA) guaranteed issue and community rating provisions, which protect the ability of the estimated 52 million Americans with pre-existing conditions, such as diabetes and arthritis, to purchase health insurance coverage. These provisions require private health insurance providers to offer coverage to Americans with pre-existing conditions and prohibit them from charging higher premiums based on an individual’s pre-existing condition(s). They are also some of the most popular provisions of the health law, with 75 percent of Democrats and 63 percent of Republicans in support.

These crucial provisions have made it possible for some Americans with pre-existing conditions to purchase health insurance coverage for the first time and have contributed to the decline in the percentage of Americans who are uninsured. In the unlikely event that these provisions are ruled unconstitutional, insurers will once again be able to charge prohibitively expensive premiums to these individuals – or to simply deny them coverage outright. This move by the DOJ also injects a fresh dose of uncertainty into the individual health insurance market, further contributing to instability that the administration and its allies in Congress have created.

Even as the Trump administration attempts this major blow to the health law’s provisions on individuals with pre-existing conditions, it also continues its “death by a thousand cuts” approach to upending the nation’s health system under the ACA. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has indicated to states that it supports state waivers to impose work requirements on “able-bodied” adult Medicaid beneficiaries (the Obama administration denied several similar state waiver requests).

To date, CMS has approved such waivers for Arkansas, Indiana, Kentucky, and New Hampshire, with seven other states waiting for approval. Such requirements require beneficiaries to certify that they have completed a certain number of hours of work or “community engagement” in order to be eligible for Medicaid; if they do not do so, they would lose their Medicaid benefits. Such waivers could potentially act as a barrier to coverage, especially considering that most Medicaid beneficiaries already are employed, while those who are not employed generally face significant barriers to employment.

These moves come even as more states realize the positive impacts of Medicaid expansion and as support for the ACA remains high. On Thursday June 7th – the same day, ironically, that DOJ filed its brief – Virginia Governor Ralph Northam signed into law a bill to implement Medicaid expansion, becoming the thirty-third state (plus the District of Columbia) to do so. This expansion, which will not be implemented until January 1st, 2019, provides Medicaid coverage to an estimated 400,000 additional low-income Virginians. Maine voters also voted overwhelmingly last year in favor of Medicaid expansion in the first ballot initiative to do so; Idaho, Nebraska, and Utah are also considering expansion through similar ballot initiatives.

ANA strongly opposes any attempt to weaken protections for Americans with pre-existing conditions to purchase health insurance coverage in order to receive critical healthcare services (the official ANA statement on this move can be found here), as well as any other attempts to erode the healthcare coverage for any segment of the population. These recent moves unequivocally demonstrate how out of step the Trump administration is with the American people when it comes to healthcare. Even as it attempts to take a wrecking ball to the gains made under the ACA, states are taking steps – with significant popular support – to shore up their own healthcare systems.

Healthcare stands to be a major issue in the 2018 midterm elections – 22 percent of respondents to a recent NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll named healthcare as the most important factor in deciding their vote. The administration’s recent moves demonstrate just how much is at stake in these elections. ANA urges you to support candidates who uphold our core values and principles for health system transformation, as well as to engage with ANA’s Year of Advocacy and Hill Day 2018 activities (Hill Day 2018 will be held on Thursday June 21st). It is vital that nurses’ voices as the nation’s most honest and ethical profession and largest group of healthcare providers are heard in the public sphere and that nurses make their influence known.

The ACA: Eight Years of Increasing Access to Care

  

The landmark Affordable Care Act (ACA) recently celebrated the 8th anniversary of its enactment. Despite having extended health insurance coverage to millions of Americans and being more popular than ever (the ACA currently enjoys a favorable 54% approval rating), the Trump Administration and Congressional Republicans have repeatedly attempted to undermine and outright repeal the ACA.

The Trump Administration has additionally given states new latitude to impose work requirements, premiums and copayments on non-disabled, adult Medicaid beneficiaries. Such requirements could have a significant negative impact on enrollees; studies have shown that Medicaid coverage actually encourages work, helps individuals avoid crushing medical debt, and has kept millions of Americans out of poverty. Tightening eligibility criteria for adult Medicaid recipients also jeopardizes Medicaid coverage for their children.

In December 2017, Congress eliminated the individual mandate for Americans to purchase health insurance coverage; the Congressional Budget Office estimates that as a result, individual private market premiums will increase by 10% and 13 million Americans will lose coverage. The Trump administration has also proposed rules that would allow for the sale of plans that fail to meet essential health benefits which provide protections for individuals with preexisting conditions. As a result, healthier individuals will be attracted to sparse, less expensive plans, leaving those with more complex health conditions to purchase insurance on the Marketplace. The reliance of sicker individuals on Marketplace plans will further fuel a rise in premiums.

Despite these attempts to undermine critical aspects of the ACA, essential elements of the legislation remain intact, allowing millions more Americans to access critical preventive benefits and other healthcare services. Federal assistance toward the purchase of a Marketplace plan for those with incomes between 100% and 400% Federal Poverty Level (FPL) and federal funding for Medicaid expansion continue to increase enrollment, and essential health benefits requirements ensure that Americans receive all of their necessary care.

The continued popularity and resilience of the ACA illustrate the commitment of the American people to continue to advocate for common sense health care reform that increases the number of Americans enrolled in comprehensive health plans, and their continued resolve to reject proposals that jeopardize access to care for the most vulnerable Americans. ANA continues to oppose attempts to undermine the ACA and remains committed to supporting policies that reduce costs, provide comprehensive coverage and encourage enrollment.

Why Medicaid is More Important Than Ever

  

Too often overlooked in recent debates is the role that Medicaid plays in children’s healthcare coverage. Of the 74 million Americans covered by Medicaid, nearly 36 million are children enrolled in Medicaid and the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) – which was enacted in 1997 to ensure affordable and accessible healthcare coverage for low-income children. Roughly 38 percent of American children receive healthcare services through these two programs, and they have been critical in increasing the percentage of American children with health insurance coverage to a historic high of 95.5 percent in 2016.

Medicaid and CHIP are particularly important to some of the nation’s most vulnerable children – 76 percent of children living in poverty, 48 percent of children with special health needs, and 48.8 percent of children ages three and under are covered under Medicaid and CHIP. Furthermore, 49 percent of births are covered by Medicaid. Without these two programs, millions of children would go without crucial healthcare services, positioning them for a lower quality of life further down the road.

And yet, despite the indubitably positive impacts that these programs have for America’s youngest and most vulnerable, Congressional Republicans and the Trump Administration have repeatedly attempted to scale them back and reduce the number of Americans who receive coverage. Congress voted on several bills in 2017 – all of which failed to pass both chambers – which would have reduced Medicaid eligibility, slashed funding, and imposed caps on state Medicaid programs. Congress also chose to play political football with CHIP, which expired on September 30, 2017, and did not re-authorize the program until January 2018, a full four months after its funding had expired. The Trump Administration has also opened the door for states to impose work requirements on Medicaid recipients. These proposals have all been aimed at low-income Americans, who are burdened enough already as they work to make ends meets.

Reducing coverage to reduce poverty and encourage work is counterintuitive given that Medicaid actually encourages Americans to remain employed, and implementing such proposals would have drastically negative impacts on the nation’s low-income and vulnerable populations. Seventeen percent of American parents receive health insurance coverage through Medicaid; reducing Medicaid eligibility and funding for adults would also reduce coverage for those children whose parents receive coverage through Medicaid. Medicaid also helps to keep millions of Americans out of poverty and out of debt. The burden of this reduction in coverage, meanwhile, would fall equally, and unfairly, on parents and their children.

While CHIP has been fully re-authorized for 10 years and there are currently no legislative proposals to roll back Medicaid coverage that appear close to passage this Congress, it is important to recognize not only during this Medicaid Awareness Month, but all year, the impact the Medicaid has on such a large segment of Americans. ANA continues to support universal access to affordable and accessible healthcare coverage and continues to stress the importance of preventive services. Medicaid and CHIP are some of the most important programs toward achieving those principles, and we urge Congress and the Trump Administration not to jeopardize Medicaid coverage for any Americans.